Step 2: Click on the present photo viewer app over there and look for ‘Windows Photo Viewer’. The default photo viewer will be visible here. Click on ‘Default Apps’ and check ‘Photo Viewer’.I don't need editing capability. I want a true 1:1 / 100% zoom (where 1 pixel in the image = 1 screen pixel). I don't want to have to do CMD-A to select all files in the folder. I want to be able to double click a single photo in a folder to launch the viewer, and then jump to next & previous photos via the arrow keys. I want a photo viewer that's simple and quick.
![]() ![]() (The so called "actual size" zoom option is far more enlarged than 1:1.)Xee: Workflow felt too much like Preview.Google Picasa: Appears to create a database as far as I can tell lacks true 1:1 zoom.Photos.app: Creates database. Doesn't have true 1:1 zoom state. Plug-in for Photoshop, PhotoLine, Affinity Photo (version 1.7 or later).Here's what I've tried so far, and my impressions:Preview.app: Have to do CMD-A (or preselect all pictures you want to view). Under the Java console section, select the Show console radio button.Standalone application (JPEG, 8 or 16-bit TIFF) External editor for Lightroom. Click the Java Preferences icon and then the Advanced tab. In addition to everything above, it had a filmstrip that would auto-hide/unhide and a superb exif presentation with histogram. THIS is/was the perfect image viewer. If that's true then Photos app is a cruel joke.)ArcSoft's Photo+ : This. Zooming manually is easy (+/- keys) but there's no scale indicator. There's an "Actual Size" zoom option, but again it's like a 2x or 4x overzoom, not 1:1. I'll probably keep using this if I cant find anything better but it still has some annoying aspects: Lacks true 1:1. This app was exactly what I was looking for but my trial period just ended so Im out of luck now.Sequential - This is ok. You can download it and use it as a 2 week trial but they don't appear to sell activation keys anymore. I want to be able to double click a single photo in a folder to launch the viewer, and then jump to next & previous photos via the arrow keys. Seriously, that's useless!!) Another mistake: it uses the file creation date for the "Image Created" field, not the actual Capture Time.That all said, if this isn't too inflammatory, does anyone care to offer what image viewer they use and why it works for them?I want a photo viewer that's simple and quick. (example: Exif from my Canon G15 jpgs contains "Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area". Very easy to read. Sequential's exif report is like a blind dump of whatever junk the camera wrote. I think ArcSoft Photo+ would intelligently cluster key camera & lens settings like exposure time, aperture, focal length etc. (Zooming over a mouse-click point is the ideal behavior here.) EXIF presentation is ok but not great. Activate Photo Viewer Full Screen ViewingIf the Finder folder is in list view, down-arrow advances to the next image (if the folder is in icon view, you have to 'physically' walk your way through it, ie, right-arrow gets you to the right and down-arrow gets you down) You don't have to do a select all, you can select one image and hit the spacebar to get going. You did not list 'full screen viewing' as a requirement (though you might want it). I want a true 1:1 / 100% zoom (where 1 pixel in the image = 1 screen pixel).Quick Look (ie, the Finder) gets you very close. Advantages are you can also view image metadata, add metadata (though it seems they might only be accessible from within Lyn), though there are also Quick Look plugins that allow you to view some basic metadata (I am not sure however if they, eg, SneekPeek Photo, are still available).I don't need editing capability. There are apps that one could call alternative file browsers (I happen to have Lyn installed) where you can have fullscreen mode (though it's a two-step process: a) 'open' image & b) make fullscreen) and arrow navigation without having to first do a select all (or manually extend the 'window' to fullscreen) but then you are limited to navigating your folder structure from within Lyn and not from the Finder which means for example that you are limited to list view and don't have normal Finder sidebar. You can also manually extend the Quick Look 'window' and it will keep its size as long as you are 'in' Quick Look.I'd say things don't get any more lightweight than Quick Look. However, even without fullscreen mode, Quick Look displays content using about 90% of the screen height which might be good enough for casual viewing. With a mouse, you have to press down the (left) mouse button to pan around.Note, if you want to view things fullscreen (press alt spacebar), using the arrow keys doesn't work anymore or rather you have to select all images first for them to work. If you have a trackpad, you can then pan around within the 100% view with two fingers on the trackpad. It's a great library manager but a poor slideshow presenter.Do you have two different sets of photos (one inside of LR and one that never sees LR)? Or do you export all images out of LR after processing? Otherwise this 'photo viewer' you are looking for won't show any adjustments you made in LR.Lilyview: I found it very buggy. The reason I don't want to just use LR as a viewer is because it's slow. I don't want an app that creates it's own database of thumbnails (that's LR again). Very wierd.There are also design aspects I disagree with. Instead, the Option key would activate an over-zoom state beyond 1:1. Also the Option-0 would sporadically fail to revert to Fitted zoom. Then the next picture would display fine, then 5-10 pics later, stained glass again. The dealbreaker for me is that you still have to pre-select all files to be able to scroll (next/previous via arrow keyas) in true fullscreen mode. (Don't force me to use the track pad-two finger method, which works very poorly for me.)So overall I wouldn't buy Lilyview for a nickel, let alone the $5 they charge for it.Quicklook (spacebar in Finder) > I had forgotten about this when I wrote the OP, but I also just assumed it was another variation of the default PReview.Anyway, I've tried that and noticed all the aspects mentioned above. Can't pan within the image via mouse-click dragging when zoomed larger that Screen Fit. No way to view EXIF (that I could find). So then Zoom to Fit Screen so also be CMD-something, not Optn-0. It mis-interprets keywords having dashes or spaces. (seriously?) Zoom In via the “+” key doesn’t work. (Im beginning to wonder if I have the wrong notion of what “actual size” should be?) There's a keyboard shortcut to zoom to "actual size" (CMD-0) but no complementing keyboard command revert to Screen Fit. Epson xp 400 driver for macDoes it do a real fullscreen view of images? I couldn’t find any real info about Bridge on Adobe’s website beyond the 1 minute video.Photomechanic > yes, I balk at the cost. )Adobe Bridge > interesting. (context: I’ve been doing software QA for almost 20 years. Cant show the filmstrip in non-fullscreen mode.It looks like they wanted to design a smart app but did zero testing before releasing, yielding. Can't show EXIF in Fullscreen mode. It ignores dates and sorts by filename. Its flaws are the least severe of what I've tried sofar. I'm pretty heavily invested in LR but I'd consider switching to something else, even at monetary cost, if it had the right combination of editing and cataloging capability plus slideshowing viewing ease and speed.But it looks like Sequential will remain my non-LR viewer of choice. Oops!!! So Im not inclined to spend another $150 for something that seems like a LR equivalent.If I find time I'll do a free trial of some of these 3. I usually export a copy of the edited version so I can see both the original and edited versions in non-LR slideshows. I love LR’s Develop module and I use it for favorite photos I want to make “perfect” or just improve if they were badly exposed for example. I use LR mainly as an organizer and I don’t edit most of the pictures I take. Anyone have an access key they want to share?Regarding the question of whether I keep multiple copies of photos in my library (due to the fact than LR Development edits are invisible outside of LR): The answer is yes, sort of.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJodi ArchivesCategories |